Working with online engagement tools

Keep your online engagement tools. Add the practice behind them.

For organizations using EngagementHQ (Granicus), Social Pinpoint (now Social Point by Open Point), Go Vocal, PublicInput, SurveyMonkey or web forms to collect feedback. Your tools collect participation well. The planning, governance, analysis and reporting around them still live in documents and email. CE Canvas connects the two without replacing anything.

At a council pop-up stall, an engagement officer helps a resident complete an online survey on a tablet while another resident scans a QR code on her phone

Your situation

Why online engagement tools alone do not make engagement consistent

You use online engagement tools such as an engagement platform, SurveyMonkey, website forms or spreadsheets, but the internal work is disconnected. Planning, approvals, analysis and reporting still happen in documents and email.

Beyond the digital engagement platform: why platforms deliver participation but not practice
  • Collection is consistent but planning and approvals are not.
  • Analysis is repeated by hand for every project.
  • Reports are assembled at the end rather than produced from evidence captured along the way.
  • No one can show how input influenced the decision.

Connecting your online engagement tools

What changes with CE Canvas

  • Planning, governance and decision scope defined before collection starts.
  • Evidence from your online engagement tools and other channels brought into one project record.
  • Analysis and report-back produced from that record, with traceability.
  • Your tools stay. CE Canvas becomes the practice layer behind them.

Recommended first step

Engagement Workflow Review

A structured look at how feedback moves from your collection tools into planning, governance, evidence and reporting, and where it stalls.

Best fit when

  • You use online engagement tools, surveys, website forms or spreadsheets to collect feedback.
  • Planning, approvals, analysis and reporting happen in documents, email and inboxes.
  • Different teams run engagement differently and reporting is assembled at the end.

What you get

  • A map of your current workflow from project start to report-back.
  • The handoffs where evidence, decisions and accountability go missing.
  • What to keep (your tools stay), what to connect, and what to standardize.
  • A recommended first project to run end-to-end in CE Canvas.
Review your workflow

Also on this path

When you are further along

Validate

Guided Pilot

A paid, time-limited pilot on one real project, governed by agreed success measures, with fees credited toward the first annual subscription.

Design a pilot

Build support

Business Case Builder

Secure leadership and budget support with an auditable case, without invented numbers.

Build your business case

Questions

Common questions about connecting your online engagement tools

Does CE Canvas replace EngagementHQ, Social Pinpoint (now Social Point) or our survey tool?

No. Online engagement tools collect input and CE Canvas is the practice layer behind them. Planning, decision scope, approvals, analysis and report-back happen in CE Canvas; collection stays where it is.

How does feedback get from our platform into CE Canvas?

Exports from your online engagement tools, surveys, meetings and written submissions are brought into one project record, where they are analyzed together and every finding stays traceable to the comment behind it.

What does an Engagement Workflow Review involve?

A 45-minute working session with the people who run engagement day to day, a map of how feedback moves from collection to reporting today, and a one-page review of where evidence and accountability go missing.

Not the right path?

Choose the situation that fits, or compare the paths side by side.